Sign on

SAO/NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service


· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· Full Refereed Journal Article (PDF/Postscript)
· Full Refereed Scanned Article (GIF)
· References in the article
· Citations to the Article (49) (Citation History)
· Refereed Citations to the Article
· SIMBAD Objects (23)
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Evolutionary versus dynamical time scales for the evolution of the central stars of planetary nebulae
Authors:
McCarthy, J. K.; Mould, J. R.; Mendez, R. H.; Kudritzki, R. P.; Husfeld, D.; Herrero, A.; Groth, H. G.
Affiliation:
AA(Palomar Observatory, Pasadena, CA), AB(Palomar Observatory, Pasadena, CA), AC(CONICET, Instituto de Astronomia y Fisica del Espacio, Buenos Aires, Argentina), AD(München, Universität, Munich, Germany), AE(München, Universität, Munich, Germany)
Publication:
Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 351, March 1, 1990, p. 230-244. Research supported by the Max-Planck-Institut für Physik und Astrophysik. (ApJ Homepage)
Publication Date:
03/1990
Category:
Astrophysics
Origin:
STI
NASA/STI Keywords:
Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, Planetary Nebulae, Stellar Evolution, Absorption Spectra, Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram, Photoionization, Stellar Envelopes, Stellar Mass, Stellar Winds
DOI:
10.1086/168458
Bibliographic Code:
1990ApJ...351..230M

Abstract

The disagreement between evolutionary and dynamical time scales for the evolution of the central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPN) through the H-R diagram is investigated. Three possible reasons for the disagreement are examined: (1) the nebulae could have experienced a phase of rapid photoionization of material ejected previously while the stars were still on the AGB; (2) the central stars could have undergone a late helium shell flash and returned to the AGB; and (3) the AGB-CSPN evolutionary transition times could have been increased by small additional amounts of residual envelope material remaining after the superwind mass-loss phase. Mechanism (3) is favored here because it can account for evolutionary ages both less than and greater than the corresponding dynamical ages.

Printing Options

Print whole paper
Print Page(s) through

Return 600 dpi PDF to Acrobat/Browser. Different resolutions (200 or 600 dpi), formats (Postscript, PDF, etc), page sizes (US Letter, European A4, etc), and compression (gzip,compress,none) can be set through the Printing Preferences



More Article Retrieval Options

HELP for Article Retrieval


Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

  New!

Find Similar Abstracts:

Use: Authors
Title
Keywords (in text query field)
Abstract Text
Return: Query Results Return    items starting with number
Query Form
Database: Astronomy
Physics
arXiv e-prints