Sign on
ADS Classic is now deprecated. It will be completely retired in October 2019. This page will automatically redirect to the new ADS interface at that point.

SAO/NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service


· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· Electronic Refereed Journal Article (HTML)
· Full Refereed Journal Article (PDF/Postscript)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:astro-ph/0503690)
· References in the article
· Citations to the Article (13) (Citation History)
· Refereed Citations to the Article
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Cosmology Under Milne's Shadow
Authors:
Chodorowski, Michal J.
Affiliation:
AA(Copernicus Astronomical Center, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland. ), AB(Copernicus Astronomical Center, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland. )
Publication:
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp. 287-291. (PASA Homepage)
Publication Date:
08/2005
Origin:
PASA
Astronomy Keywords:
methods: analytical, galaxies: distances and redshifts, cosmology: observations, cosmology: theory
DOI:
10.1071/AS05016
Bibliographic Code:
2005PASA...22..287C

Abstract

Based on the magnitude-redshift diagram for the sample of supernovae Ia analyzed by Perlmutter et al. (1999), Davis & Lineweaver (2004) ruled out the special relativistic interpretation of cosmological redshifts at a confidence level of 23sigma. Here, we critically reassess this result. Special relativity is known to describe the dynamics of an empty universe, by means of the Milne kinematic model. Applying only special relativistic concepts, we derive the angular diameter distance and the luminosity distance in the Milne model. In particular, in this model we do not use the underlying metric in its Robertson-Walker form, so our exposition is useful for readers without any knowledge of general relativity. We do however, explicitly use the special relativistic Doppler formula for redshift. We apply the derived luminosity distance to the magnitude-redshift diagram for supernovae Ia of Perlmutter et al. (1999) and show that special relativity fits the data much better than that claimed by Davis & Lineweaver. Specifically, using these data alone, the Milne model is ruled out only at a 2sigma level. Alhough not a viable cosmological model, in the context of current research on supernovae Ia it remains a useful reference model when comparing predictions of various cosmological models.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)


Find Similar Abstracts:

Use: Authors
Title
Keywords (in text query field)
Abstract Text
Return: Query Results Return    items starting with number
Query Form
Database: Astronomy
Physics
arXiv e-prints