Sign on

SAO/NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service


· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· Electronic Refereed Journal Article (HTML)
· References in the article
· Citations to the Article (2) (Citation History)
· Refereed Citations to the Article
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
The OSCROX stellar oscillaton code
Authors:
Roxburgh, Ian W.
Affiliation:
AA(Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary, University of London; LESIA, Observatoire de Paris)
Publication:
Astrophysics and Space Science, Volume 316, Issue 1-4, pp. 141-147 (Ap&SS Homepage)
Publication Date:
08/2008
Origin:
SPRINGER
Keywords:
Stars, Oscillations
DOI:
10.1007/s10509-007-9607-4
Bibliographic Code:
2008Ap&SS.316..141R

Abstract

This paper describes the OSCROX stellar oscillation code for the calculation of the adiabatic oscillations of low degree ℓ of a spherical star. There are two principal versions: one in Lagrangian variables (oscroxL), the second in Eulerian variables (oscroxE). The Lagrangian code does not require values of the Brunt Väisälä frequency or equivalently the density gradient. For ℓ=1 the oscillation equations have both an exact integral and an exact partial wave solution, and codes oscroxL1 and oscroxE1 incorporate these exact solutions. The difference in the frequencies obtained with the various codes gives some estimate of the uncertainty in the results due both to limited accuracy of hydrostatic support of the stellar model, and the limited accuracy of the integration of the oscillation equations. We compare the results of the different methods by calculating the frequencies in the range 20 2500 μHz of a model of a 1.5 Msun main-sequence star (ModelJC) kindly provided by J. Christensen-Dalsgaard for the purposes of cross comparison of codes, a modified version of this model (ModelJCA) with improved hydrostatic support, and of a highly accurate n=3 polytropic model of a star with the same mass and radius. For the polytropic model the frequencies as calculated by all codes agree to within 0.001 μHz, whereas for the 1.5 Msun main sequence model the frequency differences reach a maximum of 0.04 μHz, due primarily to the limited accuracy of hydrostatic support in the model; this is reduced to 0.01 μHz for ModelJCA.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

   


Find Similar Abstracts:

Use: Authors
Title
Keywords (in text query field)
Abstract Text
Return: Query Results Return    items starting with number
Query Form
Database: Astronomy
Physics
arXiv e-prints