SAO/NASA ADS Physics Abstract Service

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)

· Electronic Refereed Journal Article (HTML)

· arXiv e-print (arXiv:1503.06011)

· References in the article

· Citations to the Article (4) (Citation History)

· Refereed Citations to the Article

· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)

·

· Translate This Page

Abstract

Purpose: We reconsider the analysis of the sensitivity of neutron resonance energies E_i to changes in α with a view to resolving uncertainties that plague earlier treatments.

Methods: We point out that with more appropriate choices of nuclear parameters, the standard estimate (from Damour and Dyson) of the sensitivity for resonances in S^m is increased by a factor of 2.5. We go on to identify and compute excitation, Coulomb, and deformation corrections. To this end, we use deformed Fermi density distributions fitted to the output of Hartree-Fock (HF) + BCS calculations (with both the SLy4 and SkM^* Skyrme functionals), the energetics of the surface diffuseness of nuclei, and thermal properties of their deformation. We also invoke the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, performing the requisite microcanonical averages with two phenomenological level densities which, via the leptodermous expansion of the level density parameter, include the effect of increased surface diffuseness. Theoretical uncertainties are assessed with the inter-model prescription of Dobaczewski et al. [J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 41, 074001 (2014), 10.1088/0954-3899/41/7/074001].

Results: The corrections diminish the revised S^m sensitivity but not by more than 25%. Subject to a weak and testable restriction on the change in m_q/Λ (relative to the change in α ) since the time when the Oklo reactors were active (m_q is the average of the u and d current quark masses, and Λ is the mass scale of quantum chromodynamics), we deduce that | α_Oklo-α_now|<1.1 × 10^-8α_now (95% confidence level). The corresponding bound on the present-day time variation of α is tighter than the best limit to date from atomic clock experiments.

Conclusions: The order of magnitude of our Oklo bound on changes in α is reliable. It is one order of magnitude lower than the Oklo-based bound most commonly adopted in earlier attempts to identify phenomenologically successful models of α variation.