Sign on

SAO/NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· Electronic Refereed Journal Article (HTML)
· Full Refereed Journal Article (PDF/Postscript)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:0910.4945)
· References in the article
· Citations to the Article (1) (Citation History)
· Refereed Citations to the Article
· SIMBAD Objects (119)
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Estimating Redshifts for Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
Authors:
Xiao, Limin; Schaefer, Bradley E.
Affiliation:
AA(Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA), AB(Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA)
Publication:
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 707, Issue 1, pp. 387-403 (2009). (ApJ Homepage)
Publication Date:
12/2009
Origin:
IOP
ApJ Keywords:
gamma rays: bursts, cosmology: observations
DOI:
10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/387
Bibliographic Code:
2009ApJ...707..387X

Abstract

The measurement of redshifts for gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is an important issue for the study of the high redshift universe and cosmology. We are constructing a program to estimate the redshifts for GRBs from the original Swift light curves and spectra, aiming to get redshifts for the Swift bursts without spectroscopic or photometric redshifts. We derive the luminosity indicators from the light curves and spectra of each burst, including the lag time between low and high photon energy light curves, the variability of the light curve, the peak energy of the spectrum, the number of peaks in the light curve, and the minimum rise time of the peaks. These luminosity indicators can each be related directly to the luminosity, and we combine their independent luminosities into one weighted average. Then with our combined luminosity value, the observed burst peak brightness, and the concordance redshift-distance relation, we can derive the redshift for each burst. In this paper, we test the accuracy of our method on 107 bursts with known spectroscopic redshift. The reduced χ2 of our best redshifts (z best) compared with known spectroscopic redshifts (z spec) is 0.86, and the average value of log10(z best/z spec) is 0.01, with this indicating that our error bars are good and our estimates are not biased. The rms scatter of log10(z best/z spec) is 0.26, with a comparison of 0.30 for rms of log10(z spec). We made a selection on bursts with relatively accurate redshift estimation. The rms of log(z best/z spec) decreases to 0.19, and the rms scatter of log10(z spec)for this subsample is 0.28. For Swift bursts measured over a relatively narrow energy band, the uncertainty in determining the peak energy is one of the main restrictions on our accuracy. Although the accuracy of our z best values are not as good as that of spectroscopic redshifts, it is very useful for demographic studies, as our sample is nearly complete and the redshifts do not have the severe selection effects associated with optical spectroscopy.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)
   

Find Similar Abstracts:

Use: Authors
Title
Keywords (in text query field)
Abstract Text
Return: Query Results Return    items starting with number
Query Form
Database: Astronomy
Physics
arXiv e-prints