Sign on

SAO/NASA ADS Physics Abstract Service

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· Electronic Refereed Journal Article (HTML)
· References in the article
· Citations to the Article (24) (Citation History)
· Refereed Citations to the Article
· Reads History
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals: Still catastrophic consequences
Authors:
Robock, Alan; Oman, Luke; Stenchikov, Georgiy L.
Affiliation:
AA(Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA), AB(Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA; Now at Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.), AC(Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA)
Publication:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Volume 112, Issue D13, CiteID D13107 (JGRD Homepage)
Publication Date:
07/2007
Origin:
AGU; WILEY
Keywords:
Global Change: Abrupt/rapid climate change (4901, 8408), Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801, 4906), Atmospheric Processes: Clouds and aerosols, Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Pollution: urban and regional (0305, 0478, 4251), Atmospheric Processes: Stratosphere/troposphere interactions, nuclear winter, soot aerosols, nuclear war
Abstract Copyright:
Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.
DOI:
10.1029/2006JD008235
Bibliographic Code:
2007JGRD..11213107R

Abstract

Twenty years ago, the results of climate model simulations of the response to smoke and dust from a massive nuclear exchange between the superpowers could be summarized as "nuclear winter," with rapid temperature, precipitation, and insolation drops at the surface that would threaten global agriculture for at least a year. The global nuclear arsenal has fallen by a factor of three since then, but there has been an expansion of the number of nuclear weapons states, with additional states trying to develop nuclear arsenals. We use a modern climate model to reexamine the climate response to a range of nuclear wars, producing 50 and 150 Tg of smoke, using moderate and large portions of the current global arsenal, and find that there would be significant climatic responses to all the scenarios. This is the first time that an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model has been used for such a simulation and the first time that 10-year simulations have been conducted. The response to the 150 Tg scenario can still be characterized as "nuclear winter," but both produce global catastrophic consequences. The changes are more long-lasting than previously thought, however, because the new model, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE, is able to represent the atmosphere up to 80 km, and simulates plume rise to the middle and upper stratosphere, producing a long aerosol lifetime. The indirect effects of nuclear weapons would have devastating consequences for the planet, and continued nuclear arsenal reductions will be needed before the threat of nuclear winter is removed from the Earth.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)

Find Similar Abstracts:

Use: Authors
Title
Keywords (in text query field)
Abstract Text
Return: Query Results Return    items starting with number
Query Form
Database: Astronomy
Physics
arXiv e-prints