Sign on

SAO/NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service

· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings below)
· Electronic Refereed Journal Article (HTML)
· Full Refereed Journal Article (PDF/Postscript)
· arXiv e-print (arXiv:astro-ph/9708252)
· On-line Data
· References in the article
· Citations to the Article (42) (Citation History)
· Refereed Citations to the Article
· SIMBAD Objects (12)
· NED Objects (4)
· Also-Read Articles (Reads History)
·
· Translate This Page
Title:
The Far-Field Hubble Constant
Authors:
Lauer, Tod R.; Tonry, John L.; Postman, Marc; Ajhar, Edward A.; Holtzman, Jon A.
Publication:
Astrophysical Journal v.499, p.577 (ApJ Homepage)
Publication Date:
05/1998
Origin:
APJ
ApJ Keywords:
COSMOLOGY: DISTANCE SCALE, GALAXIES: DISTANCES AND REDSHIFTS, GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, GALAXIES: PHOTOMETRY
DOI:
10.1086/305671
Bibliographic Code:
1998ApJ...499..577L

Abstract

We used the Hubble Space Telescope to obtain surface brightness fluctuation (SBF) observations of four nearby brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) to calibrate the BCG Hubble diagram of Lauer & Postman. This BCG Hubble diagram contains 114 galaxies covering the full celestial sphere and is volume-limited to 15,000 km s-1, providing excellent sampling of the far-field Hubble flow. The SBF zero point is based on the Cepheid calibration of the ground IKC method as extended to the WFPC2 F814W filter by Ajhar and coworkers. The BCG globular cluster luminosity functions give distances essentially identical to the SBF results. Using the velocities and SBF distances of the four BCGs alone gives H0 = 82 +/- 8 km s-1 Mpc-1 in the CMB frame, valid on ~4500 km s-1 scales; the error includes both systematic and random contributions. Use of BCGs as photometric redshift estimators allows the BCG Hubble diagram to be calibrated independently of recession velocities of the four nearby BCGs, yielding a far-field H0 = 89 +/- 10 km s-1 Mpc-1 with an effective depth of ~11,000 km s-1. The larger error in this case is due to the photometric cosmic scatter in using BCGs as redshift estimators; this H0 is not significantly different from the more local value. The concordance of the present results with other recent H0 determinations and a review of theoretical treatments on perturbations in the near-field Hubble flow argue that going to the far field removes an important source of uncertainty, but that there is not a large systematic error to be corrected for to begin with. Further improvements in H0 depend more on understanding nearby calibrators than on improved sampling of the distant flow.
Bibtex entry for this abstract   Preferred format for this abstract (see Preferences)
   

Find Similar Abstracts:

Use: Authors
Title
Keywords (in text query field)
Abstract Text
Return: Query Results Return    items starting with number
Query Form
Database: Astronomy
Physics
arXiv e-prints